瘀爆: ---
mug mug 當道. 狼朋犬黨 - 陰雲滿天 公義去了那
紀錄之, 讓後人都見到
商台公布據稱是紀文鳳發言錄音全文：
" Chairman, I have been a corporate CEO and employer for over 30 years, and I have interviewed and hired hundreds of people in the past. But never in my life have I encountered a candidate who will overtly and recklessly discuss his or her potential employment at any stage of the recruitment process. This in fact is already in breach of confidentiality.
It is most unfortunate that the candidate recommended by the University Search Committee has never been tabled at this Council for deliberation, in our view we are actually doing it according to procedures.
I am in support of press freedom and also in sympathy with the candidate who defended himself against the criticism of some media, but apparently he has gone too far, to create controversy and use external and internal forces, directly or indirectly to lobby, pre-claim, coerce, intimidate, fabricate and sometimes even threaten Council members to approve his appointment. I myself was a victim on Febrary12 this year, when I was accused by a local newspaper for stalling his appointment at this Council. I then had to issue a public statement to clarify that the Council has not even started to discuss this appointment. This is just one incident among many, and to me, all these tactics in fact are interferences with the University affairs at highest level.
As members of the Council, and also trustee of the University, we are professionals with our independent judgment and ethics, we do our assessment based on the (…… )community at large. Given that position of the pro-vice-chancellor is responsible for academic recruitment and resources, the pro-vice-chancellor should be a role model for all, staff and students included. So I have strong reservation about the recommended candidate’s integrity and I would not accept the recommendation. Thank you. "
紀文鳳9.29批評陳文敏重點
「我從未遇上一個應徵者，他會在招聘期間公開地、不顧一切地討論他或她有機會取得的職位，事實上這個做法已經違反了保密原則。」
「我非常支持新聞自由，而且非常同情這名候選人需要就媒體對他的批評作出反擊。」
「但明顯地，他過火了，他製造爭議，利用外間及內部力量，直接或間接地游說、預先表明、脅迫、恐嚇、偽造，有時甚至威嚇校委會成員去通過他的任命。」
「我們作出評估都是基於公眾的最大利益，副校長應該是一個典範。基於我對這名被推薦候選人的誠信非常有保留，故此我不接受這個推薦。」
註：紀文鳳以英文發言
資料來源：商台節目《在晴朗的一天出發》
【昨約2:30pm】紀發聲明回應被錄音
對於有關港大校委會會議上的機密討論內容，懷疑被人偷錄並連日在傳媒公開，我感到非常震驚，道德淪亡到如此地步，實在令人痛心！竊聽行為嚴重違反校委會的保密原則，亦反映有人刻意透過此等卑鄙、違法手段和行為去干預大學事務，破壞院校自主。
我擁護言論自由，但我譴責一切失實、違規的報道，一如我在今年2月被指力阻陳文敏教授擔任港大副校長，我第一時間作出澄清。今天，我仍然強調我在2月的回應正確，而我肯定我自己在校委會會議中的討論，是本着為母校、為香港下一代和香港未來出一分力，絕對沒帶有任何政治動機，希望大家珍惜言論自由的空間。
在任何事情都被政治化的艱難時刻，作為港大校友和信託人，我有責任守護港大的聲譽，我亦會在未來三年克盡己任，以港大的長遠和最大利益為依歸，繼續盡力貢獻香港大學和香港。
【昨約5:00pm】陳回應紀文鳳錄音
公道自在人心，對於紀小姐嘩（譁）眾取寵誹謗失實的言論我深表遺憾和失望。校委會「等埋首副」的決定，引起全城嘩（譁）然，不但離棄既定程序，又置校長的意願於不顧，這才引起社會上強烈的反嚮（響）。作為校委不去自省而諉過於人，是不負責任的態度。作為大學的信託人而將大學持份者的意見說成是威嚇，脅逼（迫）甚至恐嚇，是荒唐和失職的表現。
自己十分感謝校友，師生和社會人士的支持，但我從沒參與任何支持我的討論或行動，自己獲推薦的決定，是由文匯報率先披露，紀小姐妄（罔）顧事實，將報章或他人的評論歸究（咎）為我對校委會的「脅逼（迫）、恐嚇，偽造，甚至威嚇校委會成員」，這種嚴重指控，不但毫無事實根據，亦屬對我個人的誹謗，對這種不負責任在背後暗箭傷人的誹謗行為，本人極度遺憾和不恥（齒），亦保留法律追究的權利。 
留言列表
